Comments on: Coronavirus Pt3 – Testing: What are we doing? What does it mean?

By: Michelle

Michelle — Wed, 17 Feb 2021 06:59:28 +0000

Are they putting something into your body when they test you for covid, like a virus or nano bots?

By: Chris

Chris — Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:04:21 +0000

Arby, I was wondering the same thing. Even during the second LR interview, Dr Tenpenny mentioned the sars-cov-2 “virus” but never followed up with the fact that it has never been isolated and purified. Basically whenever I now read sars-cov-2, I replace it with “unicorns” until it has been proven to exist using Koch’s postulates.

By: Rosanne Aragona

Rosanne Aragona — Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:15:26 +0000

AWESOME article and I 100% agree. I live near too many who are mad at me for not wearing a mask, gloves and social distancing. They tell me I read too many conspiracy theories. I ask them if they want to live in a socialist country, they say no then I tell them that the front line doctors are the ones they should listen to not the CDC or WHO as they have a “New World Order” agenda but they are still ignorant. I applaud you Dr. Tenpenny as I have listened to you for many many years.

By: JayTe

JayTe — Sat, 25 Jul 2020 21:16:39 +0000

Hi Dr. Tenpenny,

I just discovered and really like your site. I just have a question about the RT PCR Test. I have been following the work of Dr. Andrew Kaufman as well as articles from the Off-Guardian in the UK who have been very critical of this test being used as a diagnostic tool. In fact the inventor of the PCR Test, Karis Mullins, stated specifically that it was not be used for diagnostic purposes. The key issues with the RT PCR test are:
1. COVID-19 has never been purified and visualized
2. Only visualized from one patient inside a human cell
3. RT-PCR never tested against gold standard SARS-COV2.

I’m wondering whether you have looked into this issue since the study done by Paul Wikramaratna et al seems to be a meta study of existing RT RCR Testing usage for COVID-19 assuming that the issues listed above don’t exist. I will provide the link to the article in the Off-Guardian and to an interview of Dr. Andrew Kaufman that highlights these issues.

All the best!
Dr. Andrew Kaufmann presentation on Covid-19
https://youtu.be/roDGPZMev7s

Off-Guardian article – Covid-19 PCR Test is scientifically meaningless
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/

By: Robert Turner

Robert Turner — Fri, 10 Jul 2020 07:45:32 +0000

I have Myasthenia Gravis in remission but no symptoms of so called Covid 19 so how does my condition require Testing for anything? My Doctor advised me not to be vaccinated for anything with live vaccines. I refuse to be vaccinated when I am considered healthy at 91 years of age!

By: VaxxterAdmin2

VaxxterAdmin2 — Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:01:45 +0000

Ask what type of testing did they do to determine that he was “positive” – was it (1) RT-PCR (real-time PCR), (2) RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase PCR) or (3) serology testing (for IgG antibody). If he is positive by (1) it means he was exposed to the SARS-COV2 virus, most likely in the last 30 days. If he’s asymptomatic, it means nothing. If he is positive by test method (2), it means he was exposed to one of the coronaviruses in the family of 36 viruses. If he’s asymptomatic, it means nothing. If he is positive to test method (3), it means he was exposed to one of the coronaviruses in he at some point in his life. It’s a non-specific marker. The rise of someone being “contagious” who has a positive “test” and is asymptomatic is negligible.

Think of it this way: reporting that the number of car accidents is increasing is IRRELEVANT if no one is injured or died. What would be important would be showing that more car accidents leads to more deaths. If the number of accidents goes from 10 to 1000 but there is not an increasing number of deaths, the number of reported accidents doesn’t matter. Scaring the public by reporting more “positive” tests means nothing if there is no corresponding increase in serious infections, leading to hospitalization or a corresponding increase in the number of deaths.

This study was published April 2020: A patient with congenital heart disease tested “positive” to REAL-TIME PCR, meaning, the actually identified the SARS-CoV2 virus. The patient was asymptomatic. 455 contacts were identified through “contact tracing” They were all tested. They found ZERO cases in contacts: *nothing* was spread from the “asymptomatic carrier.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219423/

I’ve been repeating this for the last two months. Testing is irrelevant and expensive and inaccurate. Masks NOT needed.

By: EP

EP — Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:10:45 +0000

My son had to have surgery which required a Covid test to be admitted. He came back positive. He is totally asymptomatic. Not sure what that should mean for our family… do we all quarantine? Do we ignore it since he is probably not contagious? Thoughts?

By: Lois

Lois — Fri, 12 Jun 2020 02:58:20 +0000

I want to believe everything that I just read, but don’t know if I can risk being maskless,and/or not social distancing in large groups. Please continue to update you medical findings. Appreciatively, Lois

By: VaxxterAdmin2

VaxxterAdmin2 — Sat, 06 Jun 2020 02:57:43 +0000

Dr Kaufman told me that the information about exosomes has been around for about 30 years; that’s “relatively new” science in the big scheme of things. The exosome theory pushes hard against the existing Germ Theory so it will only be slowly embraced. That said, I believe it is gaining traction.

By: Ken DeCiancio

Ken DeCiancio — Sat, 30 May 2020 17:30:41 +0000

Hello Dr. Tenpenny, Have you looked into Quercetin and Zinc as an even safer and non prescription treatment instead of HC drug?