<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;More Than 8 Million Susceptible To Measles&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://vaxxter.com/more-than-8-million-susceptible-to-measles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://vaxxter.com/more-than-8-million-susceptible-to-measles/</link>
	<description>Scientific articles exposing vaccine myths and pharma foibles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:37:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3</generator>
			<item>
				<title>
				By: Demetri				</title>
				<link>https://vaxxter.com/more-than-8-million-susceptible-to-measles/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demetri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaxxter.com/?p=5#comment-32</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[If Brian Deer is wrong about Wakefield’s work, I would have expected awrit the size of Texas to denecsd upon the Times, and for Wakefield to sue the pants off Deer for defamation. Can you explain why none of this has happened? Next time you post a reply, email me so I know. I only saw this by chance.Why did Wakefield discontinue his libel case? It was impossible for him and his legal team to fight the GMC case and the libel case side-by-side. The GMC case has been the longest running one ever and has lasted over approximately 140 days. Just double that plus double the preparation time and getting witnesses to both sets of hearings and having the trial Counsel in both places at the same time. The lawyers sought an adjournment of the libel case and the Court refused.Perchance it could be that Deer’s claims are (once again) actually true?Perchance pigs could fly? Like Deer claiming he is not the GMC complainant when a Court judgement records he is and cites three of his letters of complaint. Deer has never produced the letters because he can&#039;t. They show he is the complainant.And when all the evidence in the GMC has been showing his allegations are barking mad, he reports not one word of it. Instead he comes out with a new claim which he could not find a single expert to confirm has any basis. This is Deer&#039;s latest claim:-an eminent gastroenterologist with an outstanding career and published research history, working at the Royal Free HospitalLondon, a leading English teaching hospital with an international reputation,  fixed data  and in a high profile paper and not a singleone of the 12 other authors noticed this at the time or for the past 11 years because they were all in a conspiracy with Wakefield. What nonsense.  The amazing thing is The Sunday Times published it and now they have been challenged to prove it   funny old thing   they have nothing to back it up   not a single piece of paper or expert [all they have is Brian Deer&#039;s word].]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Brian Deer is wrong about Wakefield’s work, I would have expected awrit the size of Texas to denecsd upon the Times, and for Wakefield to sue the pants off Deer for defamation. Can you explain why none of this has happened? Next time you post a reply, email me so I know. I only saw this by chance.Why did Wakefield discontinue his libel case? It was impossible for him and his legal team to fight the GMC case and the libel case side-by-side. The GMC case has been the longest running one ever and has lasted over approximately 140 days. Just double that plus double the preparation time and getting witnesses to both sets of hearings and having the trial Counsel in both places at the same time. The lawyers sought an adjournment of the libel case and the Court refused.Perchance it could be that Deer’s claims are (once again) actually true?Perchance pigs could fly? Like Deer claiming he is not the GMC complainant when a Court judgement records he is and cites three of his letters of complaint. Deer has never produced the letters because he can&#8217;t. They show he is the complainant.And when all the evidence in the GMC has been showing his allegations are barking mad, he reports not one word of it. Instead he comes out with a new claim which he could not find a single expert to confirm has any basis. This is Deer&#8217;s latest claim:-an eminent gastroenterologist with an outstanding career and published research history, working at the Royal Free HospitalLondon, a leading English teaching hospital with an international reputation,  fixed data  and in a high profile paper and not a singleone of the 12 other authors noticed this at the time or for the past 11 years because they were all in a conspiracy with Wakefield. What nonsense.  The amazing thing is The Sunday Times published it and now they have been challenged to prove it   funny old thing   they have nothing to back it up   not a single piece of paper or expert [all they have is Brian Deer&#8217;s word].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 47/61 queries in 0.074 seconds using Disk

Served from: vaxxter.com @ 2025-03-15 07:03:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->