I’ll mention here this book, “Vivisection or Science, A Choice to Make,” written by an ex-vivisector who admits he has no empathy for living creatures, but that he learned through experience that animal experiments are predominantly misleading, and therefore dangerous. His position, explained in detail in the book, is increasingly backed by others in his profession, as can be evidenced at “The International Congress of Doctors Against Vivisection.’

In my own simple layman’s terms, “It is not possible to obtain good out of evil.’

In addition, having researched the subject of vaccinations for 40 years, the bottom line for me is that if a syringe contains poison substances and is alleged to prevent diseases, it qualifies as a vaccine. It doesn’t matter to me what category of poison, or how the substance is absorbed by the body. New and more noxious ingredients have been introduced over the centuries since those first applications of cow pus, and all of them have been unhealthy, dangerous and deadly.

In conclusion, it seems a worse than futile endeavor to combine chemical, metal, and biological toxins, inject them into helpless animal victims, then convince ignorant human victims to become the next stage of experimentation, followed by release of said noxious injections to the public for the ultimate experiment, which never turns out well. That is, it’s worse than futile unless the goal is to build a lucrative unproductive industry, create a playground for sadists, and weaken/kill the population-at-large. Then it all makes sense.