by Fed Up Texas Chick
Remember when the lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China was deemed a crazy conspiracy theory? It is unfathomable that we still do not definitively know the origin of a virus that killed millions of people worldwide. There is still debate over the two potential scenarios – lab leak or zoonotic transfer from humans to animals. Isolation of SARS-CoV-2 has not occurred. In an April 2022 paper, Italian researchers are still asking the question: Where did SARS-CoV-2 come from? Was SARS-CoV-2 transmitted from an animal to a person or was it an engineered virus that escaped from a research laboratory in Wuhan?
Once the epicenter of bioweapon laboratory discussions, Wuhan has taken a back burner in the last week as new evidence emerges regarding multiple bioweapons labs in Ukraine.
Global Bioweapons Labs
In late February, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping met and issued a joint statement about US bioweapons activities. Shortly thereafter, internet “conspiracy theories” began regarding Putin’s reason for invading Ukraine: Was he defending his country by eliminating the many bioweapons facilities across Ukraine?
As usual, the mainstream media laughed off these theories as nonsense, that is until the Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland nervously confirmed in her testimony that Ukraine indeed had biological weapons labs, and she was worried about them falling into Russian hands.
Florida Senator Marco Rubio flat out asked Nuland whether Ukraine possessed biological or chemical weapons. If Rubio was expecting a denial, he got the opposite. Rubio was visibly stunned when Nuland confirmed the existence of the biolabs. In true deep state form, Nuland quickly shifted the narrative to one of concern that the pathogens would fall into the hands of the “evil Russians”. Even after Nuland’s startling confession, the MSM continued to denounce the Ukrainian labs as propaganda.
(Haven’t we heard this somewhere before: Russia, Russia, Russia.)
Nice try, Nuland, but not so fast. What do you mean Ukraine has ‘many biolabs’? What are they used for? What are they doing in those labs? And why are you so intimately familiar with their activity?
Soon, both Russia and China doubled down, claiming that the US has funded 336 labs in 30 countries, including the 26 labs in Ukraine. Once again, the fact-checkers came out in droves to vehemently deny all such claims, labeling the facts as disinformation.
Medical Research for Protection? Really?
Nuland tells us that the US has limited its activity, diligently working with Ukraine to prevent any lab materials from falling into the hands of the invading Russians. However, on Wednesday, March 9, Maria Zakharova, Russia’s Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, looked directly into the camera and told the United States: “We have found your biological weapons!”
Zakharova told reporters that Russia would no longer tolerate biological weapons development so close to their borders.
Zakharova referenced Nuland’s Congressional testimony and said Russia will not allow Washington D.C. to be silent this time. “As it turns out it was all happening in Ukraine,” Zakharova stated.
The following day, the National Pulse published deleted web pages revealing that former President Barack Obama was the architect behind the construction of the Ukraine biolabs to handle “especially dangerous pathogens.” The recovered article was originally posted in the summer of 2010 by then Illinois senator Obama who helped negotiate the deal for a Level 3 lab in Odessa, a major Ukrainian city. It seems that Senator Dick Lugar helped Obama with the deal, which was supposedly put in place to prevent outbreaks of the avian flu.
Interesting, since the H1N1 pandemic occurred in 2009.
Emergency Meeting Requested
Russia called for a March 11 emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Russia wanted to present evidence regarding US-supported chemical and biological weapon labs in Ukraine. The Biden administration denounced the claims as a ‘false flag, gaslighting, and disinformation event’, even before the UN meeting commenced.
The World Health Organization (WHO) played dumb, too, stating that it was unaware of any such efforts in Ukraine. Putin had a red folder full of evidence. The Russian claim was repeatedly characterized as “without evidence,” yet Russia produced voluminous documentation backing up their claims, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.
While many countries denied the laboratories, none have yet to produce proof that the labs don’t exist or that the US has not funded them.
The Gateway Pundit also reported links between the Ukraine biolabs, Hunter Biden, and Nathan Wolfe, the CEO of Metabiota. Hunter’s infamous firm Rosemont Seneca invested in Metabiota, a company that received contracts from Black & Veatch, a major contractor involved in building “Ukrainian facilities working with pathogens” (yes, these are otherwise known as biolabs).
Interestingly, Wolfe is a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader and has received the Pioneer Award from the NIH Director, Francis Collins. The Company lists the CDC, DOD, State Department, and USAID as its partners.
Is Joe Biden creating a diversion to keep everyone out of Ukraine to avoid exposing his ne’er-do-well son Hunter? Or does Joe truly not know any of his son’s business dealings, as he stated so many times during his 2020 presidential campaign?
What a tangled web we weave. In closing, the use of chemical weapons in any conflict and in any context is a grave violation of international law. This is an evolving story. Let’s see what happens.
Like what you’re reading on The Tenpenny Report?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here
Fed Up Texas Chick is a contributing writer for Vaxxter. She’s a rocket scientist turned writer, having worked in the space program for many years. She is a seasoned medical writer and researcher who is fighting for medical freedom for all of us through her work.