Nearly 60 years ago in Chile, a group of conservative Catholics led by Fabio Vidigal Xavier da Silveira declared that the Christian Democratic party became a communist tool to socialize all of Latin America. Vidigal wrote a book about it which was banned by the government at the time (hint: it was the Christian Democratic Party.)
Sound familiar?
It’s happening now in America and the biggest prize of all – creating a communist America – is at stake.
We must remember that socialism is a bridge between capitalism and communism. Both socialism and progressivism want to centralize all control of the individual. They also want to control all the land and industry. The control is gained by peaceful means, usually gradual, legislation over a period of time (such as in Obama’s eight years in office.
The major difference between socialism and communism is in the method of takeover; while socialism is “mostly peaceful protests” (sorry, couldn’t resist), communism uses violent confrontation to eliminate all dissension. Either way, the goal of both is a stateless, classless society with Big Brother government having monolithic control of society. Mussolini called it the totalitarian society: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.”
In 1963, communism’s 45 goals were read into the Congressional Record. In 1958, in the height of the Red Scare in the US, The Naked Communist: Exposing Communism and Restoring Freedom was published and millions of copies were sold. The book outlines the graphic (and failed) story of the past, present and future of communism.
Below are just a few of the 45 gems:
- Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
- Get control of the schools and teachers’ associations. Soften the curriculum.
- Infiltrate the press and gain control of key positions in radio, TV and movies.
- Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, and healthy.”
- Eliminate prayer or any religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates separation of church and state.
- Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate and old-fashioned.
- Discredit the American founding fathers as selfish aristocrats [and racists].
- Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies.
- Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
- Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents.
Sound familiar?
Many of these 45 ideals can be rolled up into three targets: property, family and religion.
Join our newsletter to stay up to date with all of Dr. T’s valuable insights.
Property
In 1848, Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto in which he proposed a classless society where group ownership was the norm. In short, you will own nothing and be happy. By the way, Karl Marx grew up as a relatively prosperous upper middle class kid, given that his father was a prominent lawyer. Marx’s longtime collaborator, Friedrich Engels, also grew up fairly rich with an industrialist father bringing in the cash.
Karl and Friedrich sound like the kids that are taking over university buildings right now in protest. My favorite story is out of Columbia University, where the protesters are asking for humanitarian aid because they didn’t bring food and water with them. According to the New York Post, some are asking for humanitarian aid in the form of sandwiches from Pret a Manger restaurant, pizzas, hot chicken, coffee and $17 roasted nuts. (Tell that to our brave soldiers in the WWII foxholes, you clueless idiots!) Who are these genius planners that they don’t add bottled water to the checklist? Clearly these kids have never been to a football tailgate party.
Sorry, it makes me so angry. I digress. Back to the main story.
This concept of own nothing and be happy apparently comes from Danish MP Ida Auken who picked the year 2030 (seemingly randomly) where she would not own a car, a house, clothes – anything. She would rent everything but not eliminate the right to own things. The World Economic Forum (WEF) wants to take your ownership rights, then track you incessantly to make sure that your ownership privileges remain desecrated.
News articles tell us that everyone LOVES shared ownership. They try to convince us that these ideas are popular. In a 2017 article by famed consultants McKinsey and Company, they tout shared car ownership, which they call “shared mobility” because it is sounds so hip and cool. They actually say that shared mobility presents great opportunities for automakers, but at the same time they say “shared mobility will slow global vehicle sales but not reverse them.” How do slowed global sales help automakers? Sorry, I’m not getting it.
In a 2017 survey, nearly 70 percent of all US respondents preferred driving their own cars, even over using services like Uber, and Americans were not interested in trading their vehicles in for shared-mobility rides—even if the rides were free. Translation; Americans then, and now, are not buying what the New World Order (NWO) is selling.
In fact, property is the bedrock of all human societies (Buckle, 1991, Cao et al., 2022). A comprehensive September 2023 paper in the journal Futures outlines it all. Ownership rights have been found among the First Nations peoples of Australia (Blainey, 2015), which likely represents the oldest surviving human culture. Property has always been a staple of society, found in both ancient Rome and Greece (Garnsey, 2007, Paturet, 2023).
But the Deep State doesn’t want you to own a car or a home. Recall above that we said socialism creeps up on you. A great example is the fact that corporations backed by private equity groups such as Blackstone and Pretium Partners have purchased tens of thousands of homes across the United States. In the areas where these home purchases have occurred, prices have increased faster than the national average. By 2030, companies like Blackrock could control 40% of US single-family homes, thus controlling your ability to buy such a home.
A future with no individual ownership is certainly not a happy one. However, the younger generations seem to think shared ownership is a great idea. In fact, older people in my family have been lectured by nieces and nephews for living in a big home “for just the two of you.” They can’t help it; after all, socialism is drilled into their heads throughout their school years.
In an article I ran across, three female friends were buying a home together. Co-ownership was the only way they could manage to escape high rent and astronomical home prices: “We don’t have any plans to go anywhere,” Schneider said. “None of us are dating currently. We’re all focused on our careers. So for now, yeah, it’s for the foreseeable future. We plan to stay.”
This statement by the three ladies is a nice transition to part 2, Marxism’s attack on the family and religion. Stay tuned for Part 2.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Like what you’re reading on The Tenpenny Report?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Get more of Dr. Tenpenny’s voice of reason at her website.
Join our list here
Make a donation here (and thank you!)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Fed Up Texas Chick is a contributing writer for The Tenpenny Report. She’s a rocket scientist turned writer, having worked in the space program for many years. She is a seasoned medical writer and researcher who is fighting for medical freedom for all of us through her work.