by Fed Up Texas Chick
On January 24, Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) held a round-table discussion on the COVID shots and other treatment protocols. Near the end of the 5-hour discussion, attorney Thomas Renz stunned attendees with data obtained from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED). This data was obtained by Renz from three whistleblowers who felt the data must be shared with the general public.
Why did the whistleblowers feel so strongly about it?
DMED contains anonymized medical data of all US military servicemen and women, and there is overwhelming proof that the COVID-19 jabs are causing devastating harm.
Here’s a sample of what the database contains:
- 300% increase in miscarriages
- 300% increase in certain cancers, and
- 1000% increase in neurological disorders.
- Bell’s Palsy (319%)
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome (250%)
- Multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases (487%)
Put in perspective, Renz explained that between January and November 2021, neurological disorders jumped from 82,000 to 863,000.
Let that sink in.
Other shocking data include:
- Pulmonary embolisms (467%)
- Immunodeficiencies (275%)
- Neoplasms (often a precursor to cancer) (296%)
- Non-traumatic hemorrhages (including subarachnoid and intracranial) (312%)
- Spontaneous abortions and miscarriages (306%)
- HIV (590%)
To put the HIV cases into perspective, over the last five years, the military database reported, on average, 454 annual cases. But in the first ten months of 2021, the number of reported HIV cases jumped to 2,681.
And, by the way, the jabs are not preventing military men and women from being diagnosed with the SARS-CoV2 virus.
DMED data: The Smoking Gun
Percentage increases were compared to the averages over the previous five years of DMED data. Attorney Leigh Dundas explained in this video from Dr. Charlie Ward that the data for previous years were relatively constant. Even the 2020 data was fairly stagnant; if COVID-19 were actually affecting young people as they claimed, we would have seen a much greater increase due to COVID infection in the 2020 data.
However, there were very few changes. When the COVID jabs were introduced in December 2020, the incidence of diseases skyrocketed, increasing a thousand-fold. Dundas explained that nearly every ICD-10 code increased, except for one – Chagas disease, an infection seen in members deployed to Mexico, Central America, and South America that is caused by a parasitic transmission from the tsetse fly to humans.
Renz told Senator Johnson,
“Our soldiers are being experimented on, injured and sometimes possibly killed.”
Watch Renz’s full testimony here.
Dundas and Renz presented evidence that the top military brass is likely covering up the true picture by manipulating DMED data to conceal certain conditions and diseases. Case in point: Anxiety had a massive percentage increase in the database but “anxiety” can include racing heart and other cardiac symptoms possibly indicative of myocarditis.
Is the military trying to hide the number of heart issues induced by these shots? Whistleblowers have noted from DMED searches for “acute myocarditis” revealed approximately 1,200 cases in August 2021. Were 900 cases truly miscategorized and later recategorized, or did the data get scrubbed?
Myocarditis cases rose from 127 to 363, a 285% increase, but the purportedly scrubbed data represent over a 1000% increase. Incidences of chest pain rose by a whopping 1,529% and breathing difficulty by 905%. Myocarditis and anxiety are certainly not the same. Myocarditis creates permanent heart damage and is certainly career-limiting as well as life-limiting.
In stark contrast to the DMED data, CDC only reports three main conditions in adults: (1) thrombosis, (2) Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), and (3) myocarditis. Despite the CDC’s own admission that 12- to 29-year-old males are most at risk for developing vaccine-induced myocarditis, the military did nothing to protect the vulnerable 18-29 age group of soldiers.
But there’s more.
DMED is the anonymized version of the Department of Defense’s (DoD) premier epidemiological resource that has all the military data, called the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS). This database is considered to be one of the best in the world, and is frequently cited in many peer-reviewed journal articles. Shortly after Renz made his whistleblower information public, the DoD said that they discovered an error in the DMED data. While they concluded that the 2021 data were accurate, the DoD stated that its data for 2016-2020 was off — not just off, but off by a factor of 10-fold. This is also interesting, given that no scientist who utilized the data during those years ever found a problem. Incredible.
Renz explains this “data mistake” very eloquently in this X22 Report interview. He also said he has more whistleblowers coming forth than he knows what to do with. He is building a body of irrefutable evidence on Fauci, the CDC, and the FDA.
Renz and Dundas also stated that the DMED was not likely to be the only government reporting system with questionable practices. They also informed the committee to investigate the Project SALUS, an integrated military-civilian database.
The Project Salus study represented an AI-based project sponsored by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) to understand better the data associated with the vaccinations. The findings should concern everyone interested in COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccine performance and seriously raise questions about POTUS declarations that the current pandemic is one of the “unvaccinated.” If the Project Salus findings are correct—and there are some limitations the authors acknowledge—a majority of those now infected by COVID-19 are vaccinated.
Project Salus also showed positive evidence regarding natural immunity against any virus variants. These investigators published that the COVID injections have diminishing protection, and in fact, lead to an uptick in breakthrough cases. Here’s the full presentation, which has not been made public. Renz strongly suggested at Senator Johnson’s meeting that the DOD and the CDC have been withholding crucial COVID vaccine surveillance data since at least September 2021.
Renz and Dundas say that the DMED data, as well as the SALUS data, deserve “independent substantiation” because scientific fraud has occurred.” Based on these data, the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for all three shots (Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J) should be revoked, as should the Biologics License Application for Pfizer’s Comirnaty product.The FDA did just the opposite. On Monday, January 31, the FDA granted full approval for Moderna’s COVID-19 injection (marketed as SPIKEVAX).
The FDA stated the approval was “based on a comprehensive submission package including efficacy and safety data approximately six months after the second dose.” The indication states that SPIKEVAX is “indicated for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 18 years of age and older.”
DMED data clearly show that the COVID-19 shots don’t prevent disease, but the FDA says it based its decision on solely an industry submittal: “the totality of scientific evidence shared by the Company in its submission package, which included follow-up data from the Phase 3 study showing high efficacy and favorable safety approximately six months after the second dose.”
SPIKEVAX has received approval by regulators in more than 70 countries.
Like what you’re reading on The Tenpenny Report?
Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here
Fed Up Texas Chick is a contributing writer for Vaxxter. She’s a rocket scientist turned writer, having worked in the space program for many years. She is a seasoned medical writer and researcher who is fighting for medical freedom for all of us through her work.